Short Interest & Thesis
Figures converted from KZT at historical FX rates — see data/company.json.fx_rates. Ratios, margins, multiples, share counts, days-to-cover, and percentages are unitless and unchanged.
Bottom Line
Reported short interest in Kaspi.kz (NASDAQ: KSPI) is low in absolute terms and low relative to liquidity — the most recent FINRA/NASDAQ settlement shows roughly 854K shares short on ~191.9M shares outstanding (~0.45% of shares out, ~2.4 days to cover) and a securities-lending fee of just 0.25% with ~2.7M shares freely available to borrow. There is no crowding signal and no borrow pressure. The short-side story that matters is qualitative, not quantitative: a credible 2024 short report from Culper Research and an unresolved U.S. securities class action keep an active thesis-risk overhang on the name, even as the official short book has been quietly destocked since the 20 April 2026 Tencent anchor transaction.
Source classification (this page treats these as separate categories and does not blend them):
- Reported short interest — FINRA/NASDAQ semi-monthly settlements via Fintel.io and ShortInterestTracker (official).
- Borrow indicators — ShortInterestTracker public-tier borrow fee & availability snapshot (third-party aggregator, daily).
- Short-thesis evidence — Culper Research (19 Sep 2024) + Krivenok v. JSC Kaspi.kz, 24-cv-10926 (C.D. Cal.) (public).
- Short-sale volume — off-exchange daily flow; trading-tape context only, NOT outstanding short interest.
Reported Positioning (Official FINRA / NASDAQ)
Shares Short (latest)
% of Shares Outstanding
Days to Cover
Indicative Borrow Fee
Reading. Reported short interest fell roughly 46% between the 15 May and ~29 May 2026 FINRA settlements (1.60M → 0.85M shares short), consistent with bear-side de-risking following the 20 April 2026 Tencent / Lomtadze / U.S. endowment anchor purchase from Baring Fintech. 0.45% of shares outstanding is well below conventional crowded-short thresholds (≥10–15% typical), and 2.4 days to cover is well below the 5–10 day band associated with squeeze-prone setups. Sources: Fintel.io (/ss/us/kspi, NASDAQ-supplied), ShortInterestTracker.com (FINRA bi-monthly).
Crowding vs Liquidity
Reading. Even under a stress assumption that only 10% of normal daily turnover is available to covers (e.g. a fast-tape, news-driven session), the existing short book clears in ~16 trading days. At a normal-tape 50% participation cover, it clears in ~3 days. Effective tradeable float is materially smaller than 191.9M shares — founder concentration is ~48% (Lomtadze 24.55% + Kim 23.35%) per the most recent 20-F — so 0.85M shares short against an effective free float of ~100M is ~0.86% of float, still low by any institutional benchmark. The thin-trading "specialist only" liquidity verdict from the technicals layer (20-day ADV ~$46M) means the risk in this name is sizing/illiquidity, not short crowding. Source: short-interest staging notes, data/tech/liquidity.json.
Borrow Pressure (Public Aggregator Snapshot)
Reading. Indicative borrow fee has held in a tight 25–28 bps range between early April and mid-June 2026 — general-collateral pricing, not hard-to-borrow. Lendable supply has ranged 2.4M–3.5M shares, i.e. ~5x daily ADV of available inventory at any time, materially more than the ~0.85M outstanding short book. Borrow is not a constraint, locates are not a friction, and a bear adding to the position today faces no fee-side disincentive. Source: ShortInterestTracker.com (public-tier view of broker borrow data; provider does not name the specific lending broker; treat as indicative not authoritative).
What this borrow data is not. ShortInterestTracker is a third-party aggregator; the underlying broker is not disclosed in the public-tier view, the metric is daily not real-time, and the locked "Net Short Volume" / "5-Day Trailing Short Interest" fields behind the paywall could change the read at the margin. The 25 bps signal is robust; the share-availability number should be treated as order-of-magnitude.
Short-Thesis Ledger
This is where the short-side story has substance for Kaspi, even though the reported book is thin.
Why this matters even with low reported SI. The Culper allegations were severe enough to take ~19% off the stock over two sessions on 19 Sep 2024 and to trigger a U.S. class action that remains active 21 months later. The market has moved on price (KSPI rallied ~30% in the six weeks after 20 April 2026), but the underlying allegations — sanctions exposure, undisclosed RPTs, executive ties — have not been adjudicated, quantitatively disclosed away, or dismissed. For a PM, the residual thesis risk is binary headline / litigation risk, not a positioning unwind.
Market Setup — How the Short Data Interacts with Catalysts
Setup interpretation. The single most informative observation is the ~46% drop in reported short interest between two consecutive FINRA settlements (May 15 → ~May 29 2026) straddling the post-20-April Tencent rally. Bears reduced into strength — a quiet capitulation more than a forced cover (borrow fee never moved off ~0.25%, locates stayed easy). Long side: the principal bear-side selling pressure that has weighed on the name since the Culper report has largely been worked off. Short side: the structural / litigation thesis is intact, the trade is no longer crowded or borrow-constrained, and a fresh short can be initiated without fee friction if a new disclosure materially advances the Culper allegations.
Off-Exchange Short-Sale Volume (Tape Context Only)
Off-Exchange Short Volume (latest day)
Off-Exchange Short Volume Ratio
Reading. Off-exchange short-sale volume ratio of ~22% sits at the moderate end of the typical 30–50% range for U.S.-listed equities and indicates routine market-maker / dark-pool activity rather than concentrated bear flow. This is daily trading flow, not outstanding short interest — it should not be used to infer crowding or positioning. Source: Fintel.io (FINRA off-exchange feed, includes dark-pool volume).
Evidence Quality & Limitations
What Would Change This Page
- A Culper Research follow-up or a second short-seller report quantifying Russia-derived revenue or sanctions-flagged customer flow would re-engage the bear side and likely drive both reported SI and the borrow fee higher.
- Motion-to-dismiss outcome on 24-cv-10926 (no public docket update surfaced) — dismissal would compress the thesis-risk overhang; survival of the complaint past MTD would extend it.
- 20-F disclosure of remediation status for the ICFR material weakness would remove a discrete governance overlay.
- A reversal of the May-15 → May-29 destock (i.e. SI rising again on the next FINRA settlement) would suggest a new bear catalyst is in motion — to be confirmed against borrow-fee response.